I’m known inside of the Pan-European Party Volt Europa by a great deal of people. I’m known as the Volt Nerd, one of the people with the most extensive understanding of the moving parts of a large organisation, with the largest knowledge of its history. And most importantly, I believe myself to hold the most important questions that a progressive, trans-national, online-forward party should be asking itself.
I have worked on so many of its key parts since I joined in 2019, with people of incredible competence, and grew alongside them. The questions behind Volt gave me a path to research and digital sociology, fields that I am itching to get in.
Volt is, to me, a dream, a goal, and I desire to make it my life’s work.
But there are some serious hurdles in that plan. They could be seen throughout these years already. If I have to name it, the issue I have is with time. I do not have time, I cannot afford to be in Volt the way I want. It’s a personal problem, but there’s also a structural and societal problem around it. Let’s move in order.
Time
The cost of participating in Volt is first built up by time.
Imagine the work of connecting a community. It can be summed up, in a nutshell, as a number of conversations as large as the amount of people involved. If connecting two people is a process involving the many conversations between them, a community is built up by a larger function of time. Fortunately, that is not directly geometric (you don’t need twice as much time to connect twice as many people). What you need to connect people on a large scale is a series of collective events:
- first, physical events. Volt’s General Assemblies, the European, the national and the local ones. They’re a huge effort, rewarded with the strongest bonds within the community.
- secondly, digital space meetings expand our connection as widely as possible. Meetings and forums, chat groups and digital content. Those do not happen at random, but have to be built, maintained and worked on.
Time is necessary to think, as well. Strategies need information gathering and plans of action, before they are fed back to the community to continue the conversation.
It is safe to say that the sheer size of a project like Volt hardly allows for part-time efforts. Even the smallest, most local project, needs to be connected to the wider strategy to be truly “part of Volt”. There is, as well, the need for resources to make that project operationally independent. Whenever one of those are lacking, the gap is filled by people spending more time.
I believe a practical example might help you understand what I mean. Imagine the simplest project of proposing a motion to a city council. Let’s say is for promoting public transport use for short commuters. Time is necessary to evaluate the idea, write the first draft, connect the ideas to other parts of Volt (both vertically and horizontally), gather public interests and access to stakeholders, and ultimately move the proposal to the city council. This path can only grow longer as difficulties arise.
The unique part for Volt in this project is the feature of connection. A balance between independence and coordination so that a local level is not encumbered by the European connection, but in fact empowered. In the best case, our example motion draws from other people’s experiences to be written with a larger base of evidence, promoted with tested practices that worked elsewhere, picked up by a wider amount of people. The knowledge and know-how that Volt can potentially offer anywhere in Europe is at the core of its value proposition. Volt has to be a platform to store and distribute knowledge, so that it allows for actions to be efficiently carried off across Europe.
Volt is, potentially, a platform to save time in delivering political actions. But in order to be a time-saver, that platform has to be built with more time.
My time
Identifying the areas where I can employ my time in Volt required reasoning such as the one above. I am aware, more than I was in the past, that my mind tends to skip some passages, so if there are logic gaps, I hope you will let me know. The thing is, I feel both in a rush and in no rush at all.
I rationally understand that the work of building Volt is going to take years, and even decades, to reach what I would call a 1.0 version of what I propose. It is only natural it would take this long with the existing constraints around its time (and people, skills, money, resources…). But I also know that the path between here and there is made by decisions we make today. Who we elect, who we allow to decide over our key processes, what we talk about. There are huge, necessary discussions about violence, non-violence, virtue, decolonialism and justice that I would like to have had, but the community isn’t quite ready yet. I hope it will, soon.
My problem is that, currently, I do not have the time to decide on anything.
Over the years, I cheated in every way possible to have time for Volt. I lost sleep and rest; I took time away from work (or job search); I made the Volt trips my holidays. I do not regret one bit of that, because nothing fires me up like a cause, knowing my contribution mattered. But it did have consequences.
I cannot explain my Volt experience on a CV. Sure, I worked on huge projects that have an impact a regular Volt member might understand. But it appears as years of volunteering for politics. I do not live in a place where politics is a viable career path. And volunteering is not “job experience” considered at the same level as paid work.
So I did the only job that the area offered. I don’t build political communities for a living, I don’t research digital communities and organisational practices. I move boxes around.
I have mixed feelings about it. Having your life’s work feel irrelevant is the hardest one I get, but I see on the other hand a concrete service I’m providing and a path (just a path, because the economy is what it is) to a better financial position where I can plan ahead and keep on trying. I wish what I’ve already done, and what I’ve proven I can be, had landed me in a better position. But alas, here I stand.
When it comes to time, for now, I have none. I cannot participate in your online calls, I work until late evening and then I sleep. I will not take my weekend to volunteer for your project, I need to see friends, play games or recuperate my muscles. I need time to do nothing in my schedule, and I won’t make the mistake of missing that, ever again.
This means that I won’t be around to participate in the processes of building the party for the foreseeable future, even if I already see stuff I disagree vehemently with, and it makes me feel powerless. Working for Volt can still be my life’s work, and I want it to be, but there is a road to walk to get there. And it’s not just mine.
Their time
This problem of mine is reflective of a problem in Volt that we haven’t fully grasped. In the past it was argued that people with less time should be allowed to have a stronger impact on the party. That’s not possible in reality. You need to be *in* a project to give the most meaningful contribution. The criticism is better framed like this: since time is the most valuable resource that one can give to Volt, who can afford the most time and why?
A feminist would know that time poverty cuts across gender and class significantly. The disproportionate burden on women when it comes to unpaid care work at home and for family is well established. On the same note, people that work physical jobs (like myself) or other service jobs that require long hours of concentration are left with very little time to spare.
This affects Volt’s participation. It is clear that those that give more time to Volt are mostly a) those that can afford it due to their condition, b) people “overspending” their time and most vulnerable to burnout, and c) employees of Volt. These groups are presented in my estimation from largest to smallest. The largest group is made out of time-rich people. Rich in time, usually, thanks to a privilege of class, gender, ethnicity, geography, or other factors. The end result is that the active population of Volt is likely to be less diverse than what our numbers show.
I do not have a solution, or at least I don’t have one that applies within the single organization at least. Universal Basic Income at a society level might have a strong positive effect, I suppose. For now, I ask of you to recognise this dynamic—it will already make a difference.
Until the next time
The things I wanted to say are all here. In so many words:
- I cannot afford to give time to Volt (barring some one-off super important events or project rushes, I am still a nerd after all)
- Because I am working to improve my personal condition so I will be able to do more in the future (please don’t break my party while I’m gone)
- I still want so much to work for Volt as a job and I will take any occasion I have for it (so let me know if something comes up)
- I will never shy away from a conversation if you want one. Especially to the people I love here, the ones I know are pouring their hearts into making this party, I refuse to let you feel alone.
I will be in Bratislava if they give me holidays. You’ll still see some of me occasionally. When I’m fully back, trust me, you’ll know.
"Mi piace" Caricamento...